| | |  | Interior Accessories | Home » » » Norton Internet Security 2010 | | | | | | | Description: | | Norton Internet Security 2010 1-User 3PCs | | | Features: | |
• Norton Internet Security 2010 delivers fast and light comprehensive online threat protection,
• Guarding your PC, network, and your identity without slowing you down
• Gives you greater insight into downloaded applications..
• ..And files by telling you where they came from, if they can be trusted, and how they may impact your PC's resources and performance
• Proactively blocks hackers and prevents dangerous software from downloading to your computer when you surf the web
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 7.6 inches | | Product Width:
| 5.2 inches | | Product Height:
| 1.4 inches | | Product Weight:
| 0.15 pounds | | Package Length:
| 7.6 inches | | Package Width:
| 5.2 inches | | Package Height:
| 1.4 inches | | Package Weight:
| 0.15 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 463 reviews |
| | | System Requirements: | | | Platform:
| Windows Vista / Windows XP / Windows 7 | | Media:
| CD-ROM | | Item Quantity:
| 1 |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 463 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
163 of 170 found the following review helpful:
Norton has done it again, almost perfect!Oct 01, 2009
By Gene Cloner
This is my fifth year of using NIS to protect my home computer and laptop. With the noticeable improvements last version, Norton came back with a bang. While NIS2010 still has some flaws, the good trend seems to continue this year as well.
Installation: Installation was very quick similar to NIS2009. It does require a restart which seems to be the case for most virus protection software. Norton for some reason wants us to download and install parental control separately. just a hazel. If you are an existing NIS user you can upgrade from Norton's upgrade website before deciding to purchase the new version. The upgrade will retain your 2009 subscription and your license will be retained as well. NOTE: If you install from CD, your old license will be over written.
Performance: I don't think NIS2010 is a resource hog. Norton also has performance meters where you can check how much of the system resources are being used by Norton. It seems NIS 2010 uses most system resources only during a complete scan. NIS2010 upgrade virus signatures on the background during idle time just like NIS2009. So you dont feel that it exists. Quick scans during idle times also seem to be pretty quick. I havent noticed any loss of performance in the one week that I have been using NIs2010.
Virus protection: Based on tests by PC world and CNET Norton is only behind the not well known G-DATA internet security in virus detection. I havent used G-DATA so I cant compare them. However, NIS has gotten better at malware detection. It did detect a number of malware that adaware and other security software that I use (e.g. Advanced system care). NIS2009 missed a number of these malware.
Network protection: Although NIS claims that when NIS is installed in all PCs on your network, it can detect and keep a trusted network, it has not worked for me. NIS detected my skype phone (ofcourse didn't protect it), but didn't detect my other PC on the network that also has NIS2010 installed. I am not sure if this 'trust' is of any use to me anyway.
Internet security: Norton identified websites that you visit (amazon, bank and ccard websites for example) as trusted ones based on IP address and other data. so you can be safe you are not entering your password on a phishing website. It is very handy for me. I always look for the 'trusted' sign from both Firefox and NIS before entering my passwords.
Password manager: I dont know if I will trust NIS to be my password manager. You need just one password for Norton and it can manage your other passwords and form filling information. However, it seems to be easy to break in to NIS to obtain the password manager's password list. Although the hacker needs physical access to your computer to do this, it is a concern if your laptop gets stolen for example. NIS2010 offers to have the password manager's list reside on removable media which is a somewhat safer alternative. Norton safe search which identifies safe websites on your serach list is also helpful, but google can do this as well.
Over all, it is a good virus protection for your PC, checks files on the fly, can scan emails and attachemnts, IM text and links. Not very good for password management and parental control.
87 of 88 found the following review helpful:
 Awesome!May 08, 2010
By Wifey Girl
"Wifey Girl"
I was a little frustrated when the upgrade online via my current (well expired) Norton's was going to cost me more than it did last year (almost 60 bucks and it was only $49.99 last year) so I came here to see if I could save a little money and I did! I was a little afraid to download it at first because I saw that it might only work until Dec 2010, but I took the chance anyway because my subscription expired today. Well, after the successful download, I copied down the Product Key, I did the upgrade via the "renew now" tab on my current (expired) Norton's, and it gave me 366 days! Yes! And it was less than 40 bucks so I'm happy about that. I only did this review in case someone else is in the same situation I was in tonight - afraid to download it! :) It's all good.
130 of 135 found the following review helpful:
 Good to see somebody focused on lightweight softwareOct 07, 2009
By Busy Executive
While most of Symantec's competitors seem to be struggling with software "bloat", it's good to see one of the big guys heading back to more of a streamlined approach.
I installed the software on two PCs so far...one a Vista Ultimate having no existing security software, and the other a Windows XP with McAffee's product. The installer suggested removing the McAffee product (which I did) and the installation was similarly uneventful on both of my systems from there on. It does force a reboot, and between the initial install plus downloading any updates, it took longer than I expected - about half an hour end to end.
As for performance, there is a slight (but noticeable) increase in the reboot time when Norton starts up - perhaps an extra 30 seconds total. And if you're sensitive to performance, you can also tell when the product is updating virus signatures in the background, or performing one of its quick virus scans.
The basic anti-virus protection seemed fine. Not too obtrusive, although it's difficult to really assess the quality of the virus scanning, since I've yet to actually encounter a virus. I tend to be careful, but still, being one of the better known products, Norton gives you a sense of security in case you do something silly and let an infected file in.
I didn't activate the network protection features that come with the product. I tend to rely instead on a router with a strong firewall capability, and then I keep my "internal" network fairly open. The product did detect a number of networked apps I use, stopping to ask my permission before letting them open whatever ports they were using. Would have been nice to set this sort of policy globally, rather than having to bump into applications one at a time.
One feature I would have liked to see is the ability to designate one of my PCs as the "master" for policy decisions and updates, with my other PCs driven from the master. For instance, on kids PCs, I'd like to set a strict policy, record any unusual activity, and know that my policies can only be changed from my central master computer. Big corporate AV systems do this - would be nice to have the same capability at home.
Like the network protection, I also didn't find myself using the password management features of the product. My PC is a ThinkPad with the built-in fingerprint scanner, and I prefer to use the IBM security software, which provides this same function. The biometric device (fingerprint reader) seems more secure, and it would be nice if Norton provided integrated support for these types of authentication devices.
The internet security feature is sort of helpful, but if you know what you're doing, you can do this on your own by looking at a sites digital certificates. Norton automates this, telling you that it's okay to trust a particular site. Not sure I'd buy the product just for this capability, but it's a nice add-on feature.
Overall, I was also glad to see that the product seemed to be fairly stable and to operate without all that much overhead. Compared to a few of the others I've tried, Norton is about the best mix of usability, capability and efficiency.
It's sort of sad that we need this type of software in today's world...I'd rather be spending my money on software to make me more productive or entertained. But, if you accept that you need protection, Norton is as good a choice as any.
34 of 37 found the following review helpful:
Norton Internet Security 2010Oct 06, 2009
By Ken
"Pop"
I first bought the new Norton Internet Security 2009 this spring and installed it on one computer (notebook)that had been using CA Internet Security and one (server) that was using Trend Micro IS 2007. The performance difference between Norton IS 2009 and the CA product was dramatic, not as much so with Trend Micro. With Norton IS 2009 my computers ran much faster and had far fewer "issues" with security software on both systems. I received an upgrade to Norton IS 2010 as an IS 2009 user at no charge and the installation on two machines went flawlessly. I am very impressed with the smaller footprint of IS 2009/10 and the tools it offers. One complaint is the long (1 week)interval between full scans if you choose to use automatic settings. It does quick scans every day but needs the ability to schedule full scan intervals as part of the automatic settings. A novice choosing manual scans could inadvertently leave their computer at a greater risk if not configured properly.
18 of 18 found the following review helpful:
Problems with networking, supportNov 12, 2009
By Lonnie E. Supnick
"Big Kahuna"
I would not recommend this software to anyone with a home network who wants to share files among computers.
I used to be a big fan of Norton security products but stopped using them due to finding that later Norton versions slowed down my computer too much. I bought Norton Internet Security 2010 because of the favorable reviews and reports that it no longer slowed down the computer.
Installation on my 3 computers went smoothly and everything looked good until I accessed the community network feature, which supposedly allows you to customize access on your own local network. At that point I could no longer access shared folders among the three computers--not at all. I tried everything obvious like setting all computers to "full trust." Nothing worked.
I found nothing on the FAQs on the Symantec website and nothing when I searched in various ways for solutions. The only way to talk to a real person at Symantec is to pay a lot for the privilege.
I joined the Norton Community to search the forums for possible solutions. I found a number of people who had similar problems with local network access after installing NIS 2010. None of them, apparently, were able to solve the problem and Symantec "experts" who tried to help them were similarly clueless. If there is a way to configure the NIS software, it is not obvious and, in any case, should be
I finally uninstalled NIS 2010 and went back to my previous security software that I know is probably not as effective, but doesn't interfere with my network.
See all 463 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
